Källén-Lehmann spectral representation

From Physics wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Consider the two-point function \left\langle 0 | T \phi(x) \phi(y) | 0 \right\rangle\, of the interacting scalar field. We wish to insert the completeness relation between the two fields in this expression, where the states are taken to be eigenstates of the momentum operator \mathbf{P}\, with eigenvalues \mathbf{k}\,. We will assume that the theory is Lorentz invariant so that \left[ H, \mathbf{P} \right] = 0\, and states can be chosen to be simultaneous energy eigenstates also. We will also assume that there is a unique vacuum state \left|0\right\rangle\, with P^\mu \left|0\right\rangle = 0\,, from which it also follows that J^{\mu\nu} \left|0\right\rangle = 0\,. Then, let

1 = \left | 0 \right\rangle \left\langle 0 \right| + \sum_n \int\!\frac{d^3k}{(2\pi)^3} \frac{1}{2 E_\mathbf{k}(n)} \left | n_\mathbf{k} \right\rangle \left\langle n_\mathbf{k}\right|\,,

where we have grouped all the states in the Hilbert space according to their momenta \mathbf{k}\,, and we have normalized the states in a Lorentz invariant way. In other words, E_\mathbf{k}(n) = \sqrt{\mathbf{k}^2 + m_n^2}\, where m_n\, is the mass of the state \left|n_\mathbf{k}\right\rangle\,, or the energy of the corresponding zero-momentum state \left|n_\mathbf{0}\right\rangle\,.

Assume x^0 > y^0\,. Then

\left\langle 0 | \phi(x) \phi(y) | 0 \right\rangle = \left\langle 0 | \phi(x) \left | 0 \right\rangle \left\langle 0 \right| \phi(y) | 0 \right\rangle + \sum_n \int\!\frac{d^3k}{(2\pi)^3} \frac{1}{2 E_\mathbf{k}(n)} \left\langle 0 | \phi(x) | n_\mathbf{k} \right\rangle \left\langle n_\mathbf{k}\phi(y) | 0 \right\rangle\,.

The first term usually vanishes by \phi(x) \to -\phi(x)\, symmetry, or by Lorentz invariance [1], so ignoring it for now,

\left\langle 0 | \phi(x) \phi(y) | 0 \right\rangle = \sum_n \int\!\frac{d^3k}{(2\pi)^3} \frac{1}{2 E_\mathbf{k}(n)} \left\langle 0 | \phi(x) | n_\mathbf{k} \right\rangle \left\langle n_\mathbf{k}\phi(y) | 0 \right\rangle\,.

Then

\left\langle 0 | \phi(x) | n_\mathbf{k} \right\rangle\, = \left\langle 0 | e^{iP\cdot x}\phi(0)e^{-iP\cdot x} | n_\mathbf{k} \right\rangle\,,
= e^{-ik\cdot x} \left\langle 0 | \phi(0) | n_\mathbf{k} \right\rangle\,,

where k^0 = E_\mathbf{k}\,. Since the states \left| n_\mathbf{k} \right\rangle\, form a complete representation of the Lorentz group, we can write \left| n_\mathbf{k} \right\rangle = U^{-1}(\mathbf{k}) \left| n_\mathbf{0} \right\rangle\, where U(\mathbf{k})\, is some unitary operator that implements the Lorentz boost from \mathbf{k}\, to 0\,, so

\left\langle 0 | \phi(x) | n_\mathbf{k} \right\rangle\, = e^{-ik\cdot x} \left\langle 0 | U^{-1} U \phi(0) U^{-1} U | n_\mathbf{k} \right\rangle\,,
= e^{-ik\cdot x} \left\langle 0 | U^{-1} U \phi(0) U^{-1} | n_\mathbf{0} \right\rangle\,,

but \phi(x)\, is a Lorentz scalar, so that  U \phi(0) U^{-1} = \phi(0)\,, and

\left\langle 0 | \phi(x) | n_\mathbf{k} \right\rangle = e^{-ik\cdot x} \left\langle 0 | \phi(0) | n_\mathbf{0} \right\rangle\,.

Then

\left\langle 0 | \phi(x) \phi(y) | 0 \right\rangle = \sum_n \int\!\frac{d^3k}{(2\pi)^3} \frac{1}{2 E_\mathbf{k}(n)} e^{-ik\cdot (x-y)} \left| \left\langle 0 | \phi(0) | n_\mathbf{0} \right\rangle \right|^2\,,

while we can implement the time ordering by

\left\langle 0 | T \phi(x) \phi(y) | 0 \right\rangle\, =\theta(x^0-y^0) \left\langle 0 | \phi(x) \phi(y) | 0 \right\rangle + \theta(y^0-x^0) \left\langle 0 | \phi(y) \phi(x) | 0 \right\rangle\,,
=\sum_n  \left[ \theta(x^0-y^0) \int\!\frac{d^3k}{(2\pi)^3} \frac{1}{2 E_\mathbf{k}(n)} e^{-ik\cdot (x-y)}  + \theta(y^0-x^0) \int\!\frac{d^3k}{(2\pi)^3} \frac{1}{2 E_\mathbf{k}(n)} e^{ik\cdot (x-y)}  \right] \left| \left\langle 0 | \phi(0) | n_\mathbf{0} \right\rangle \right|^2\,
= \sum_n \Delta_F(x-y; m_n^2) \left| \left\langle 0 | \phi(0) | n_\mathbf{0} \right\rangle \right|^2\,,

where \Delta_F(x-y; m_n^2)\, is the Feynman propagator for a free scalar field of mass m_n\,:

\Delta_F(x; m_n^2) = \int\!\!\frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4} \frac{i}{k^2 - m_n^2 + i \epsilon} e^{-ik\cdot x}.

Spectral density function

Introducing the spectral density function

\rho(M^2)= \sum_n (2\pi)\delta(M^2 - m_n^2)\left| \left\langle 0 | \phi(0) | n_\mathbf{0} \right\rangle \right|^2\,,

we can write the momentum space propagator of the interacting field as

G(p) = \int_0^\infty \frac{dM^2}{2\pi} \rho(M^2) \frac{i}{p^2 - M^2 + i \epsilon}\,.

In other words, the propagator is a superposition of free particle propagators with different masses M\,. The relative weight of each contribution is determined by the spectral density function \rho(M^2)\,, which yields information of the various states \left|n_0\right\rangle\, and their masses m_n\,.

Analytic properties

In theories with a mass gap, one-particle states contribute an isolated delta function at p^2 = m^2\, to \rho(M^2)\,, while a continuum of multi-particle states begin roughly at p^2 = 4m^2\,. In other words,

\rho(M^2) = (2\pi) Z \, \delta(M^2 - m^2) + ...\,.

Note that m\, need not equal the mass in the Lagrangian (the so-called bare mass), and is simply equal to the mass of the one-particle state. The function G(p)\, has a pole in the complex p^2\,-plane at p^2 = m^2\,. We may also show that it has a branch cut starting roughly at p^2 = 4m^2\,, i.e., where \rho(M^2)\, begins to have support. Consider the integral

\int_{\sim 4m^2}^\infty \frac{dM^2}{2\pi} \rho(M^2) \frac{i}{p^2 - M^2}\,,

where p^2 \gtrsim  4m^2\,. Then

\int_{\sim 4m^2}^\infty \frac{dM^2}{2\pi} \rho(M^2) \frac{i}{p^2 - M^2 \pm i \epsilon}\, =\frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_{\sim 4m^2}^\infty dM^2 \rho(M^2) \frac{1}{M^2 - p^2 \mp i \epsilon}\,,
=\frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_{\sim 4m^2}^\infty d\mu \frac{\rho(\mu) }{\mu - p^2 \mp i \epsilon}\,,
=\frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_{\sim 4m^2 - p^2}^\infty d\nu  \frac{ \rho(\nu+p^2) }{\nu \mp i \epsilon}\,,
=\frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_{\sim 4m^2 - p^2}^\infty d\nu  \frac{ \rho(\nu+p^2) }{\nu \mp i \epsilon}\,,
=\frac{1}{2\pi i} \left[ \mathcal{P} \int \frac{\rho(\nu + p^2) }{ \nu }  \pm i \pi \rho(p^2)  \right]\,, by the Sokhotsky-Weierstrass theorem.

The function G(p^2)\, is therefore discontinuous across the real axis when \operatorname{Re}\,p^2 \gtrsim 4m^2\,, indicating the presence of a branch cut.

back to unitarily inequivalent representations
on to multi-particle states

References

[2] [3] [1]

  1. 1.0 1.1 M.E. Peskin and D.V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1995
  2. G. Källén (1952). "?". Helv. Phys. Acta 25: 417. 
  3. H. Lehmann (1954). "Über Eigenschaften von Ausbreitungsfunktionen und Renormierungskonstanten quantisierter Felder". Nuovo Cimento 11: 342-357. 
Personal tools