Faddeev-Popov procedure
From Physics wiki
Contents |
Gauge fixing
Suppose we have a number of (bosonic) fields
and that our action is invariant under some gauge transformation
, which we denote by
for brevity.
Furthermore, let us demand that the path integral measure
also remain invariant, so that this is a true symmetry of the theory.
The set of configurations
obtained by varying the parameters
is known as a gauge orbit. The path integral sums over many physically equivalent configurations (parameterized by
), and this overcounting potentially leaves the sum divergent in a way that is difficult to keep track of. Furthermore, the equations of motion are not deterministic, often giving rise to further divergences.
We can instead pick a representative of each gauge orbit. This is done by choosing a gauge condition
and restricting the sum to configurations that satisfy this condition. Of course, we should require that the surface
intersect each orbit only once. Naïvely, we might consider inserting
into the path integral. Actually, this does not leave the path integral invariant under changes in
.
For ordinary functions, a property of the delta function gives
assuming
has only one zero at
and is differentiable there. Integrating both sides gives
.
Extending over n variables, suppose
for some
. Then, replacing
with
.
Recognizing the first factor as the determinant of the diagonal matrix
(no summation implied), we can generalize to the functional version of the identity:
,
where
is the Faddeev-Popov determinant.
Now consider inserting
,
into the path integral, where
has been chosen to make the combination equal to unity. If the transformations
act as a group, i.e.,
, where
is itself an allowable transformation, then consider
,
where we have used the fact that group multiplication is equivalent to a translation in the group. Thus
is gauge invariant, and consequently so is
, which is perhaps easier to see.
Path integral
The path integrall is now
| ,
|
,
| |
,
| |
,
| |
,
|
since
is merely a dummy variable. Therefore the potentially divergent term
has been neatly isolated and accounted for.
Determinant
Let us formally write
,
which is just the Fourier transform of the delta function (up to an irrelevant normalization). Then
.
The integrand may be equivalently be evaluated where
, and for a particular configuration
, we may translate
such that
. Thus
.
Then
.
Denote
.
Then
.
From the theory of path integrals, we recognize this as
,
which was of course by construction. We can find the inverse of this result by replacing
and
with Grassmann numbers
and
. Then
.
The anticommuting fields
and
are known as Faddeev-Popov ghosts.
Gauge-fixing terms
Our aim is to select a representative from each class of field configurations using the gauge condition
. For example, the Lorenz gauge is given by
. We can then write
.
Since
is gauge invariant, the choice of
is arbitrary. Starting with a particular choice for
, we could then replace
with
where
is an arbitrary function independent of
.
Then, since
,
,
where we have dropped the tilde.
It is important to note that
is independent of the choice of
. Furthermore, we can multiply
by any constant (before normalizing) without affecting the dynamics of the system,
| ,
|
,
| |
,
| |
,
|
where
is arbitrary.
Therefore we obtain the same dynamics if we replace
by the gauge fixed Lagrangian density
. For instance, the Lorenz gauge follows from the substitution:
.
See also
Faddeev-Popov procedure (Maxwell field) and Faddeev-Popov procedure (Yang-Mills theory).
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

